Eventually all documents will be made available with commentary on this site : so anyone is able to read, consider and follow a case from beginning to end
It is even more important for the Good State Project to provide its opinion and observations on the behaviours of the public bodies below. Each 'brushstroke' comment is deeply appropriate and supported by documentation. This provides an easy-to-interpret summary of the personality traits of the organisations
Chaotic governance structure
Polite though deeply flawed
Avoidant
Inappropriately unresponsive
Engages in bad faith
Bureaucratic, disorganised and junior-heavy
Lacks inquiry
Willing to cover for public bodies
Willing to bury materials in court documents
Deeply troubled venue
Avoids public authority misconduct
Unwilling to consider its own failures
Ignores evidence to avoid dealing with public authority misconduct
Attempts to re-write scope to avoid
Evidenced false representations
Avoidant
Makes false representations
Extremely poor conduct in proceedings
Polite and well-mannered
Issues are structural rather than behavioural
Deeply flawed organisation
Insincere approach
Customer service is however excellent
Polite at a surface level
Presumes everything related to it is 'national security' as a trump card even when it is not the case (must be pushed back on)
Deeply prejudicial, hostile and emotionally unreliable
Less competent and more error prone than expected
Appears to rely on other public bodies and individuals in positions of authority covering for it (even to their own detriment)
Avoidant